True or False ?
Posted: May 23, 2025 Filed under: Child Centered Activities, Chronicles of a First Time Parent, What is an Art Farm | Tags: history, Magna Carta, philosophy, Plato, Socrates 1 CommentThis week in homeschooling, a true/false question arose: Is habeas corpus “…a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country”? We have, by coincidence, been studying habeas corpus for the past seven weeks so this question did not come out of the blue. What has been wildly surprising is to see the topic so hotly discussed in the news.
Our humanities seminar has been titled “Habeas Corpus, Habeas Vox,” which I described in my blog dated 11 April. We began by considering those words. My son knows that a hearse carries a dead body, which is a “corpse,” so the Latin word corpus was readily understood. Habeas corpus, he knows, has something to do with a body, rather than a Presidential right.
But what to make of that Latin verb habeas? We approached that by studying the Ancient Greeks. The Spartans governed by a combination of diarchy (two kings ruled), oligarchy with limited democracy. The Athenians, however, invented direct democracy, not representative democracy like our modern form. From Athens we jumped to Medieval England to read about the Magna Carta. In his “end-of-week” essay on 2 May my son wrote:
This week in Humanities we studied the legacy of Greece. Greece is located on the Mediterranean Sea. In Classical Greece, Athens was a city state that created democracy, but only the men citizens could vote; slaves and women could not vote.
The Greeks were known for the arts, architecture and philosophy. In Athens there was a teacher named Socrates, known for teaching by the “Socratic Method” which was asking questions to engage his students. Socrates was put to death by the courts because they thought he was corrupting his students. One of his students was Plato, who wrote the Republic, which is his views of democracy.
Something else we studied was English history. I read about the Magna Carta, a document that gives liberties granted to the English people. The English Barons and Nobles argued and threatened a Civil War unless King John granted those rights. King John was very greedy and selfish. The Magna Carta was settled on June 15, 1215 when King John affixed his seal.
The Magna Carta gives guarantees for the people as a whole. The people could not be convicted of their crimes unless they were lawfully convicted. The Barons (Nobles) had the right to declare war upon the King. The Magna Carta is considered one of the basic documents of British law.
Next week we will do studying more on English history!
We next proceeded to study the English Bill of Rights, and then the USA Constitution. Last week, my son wrote:
This week, Harvard University discovered they had an original copy of the Magna Carta. There are seven original copies, and Harvard just happened to have one. In 2007 an original copy of the Magna Carta sold for $21.3 Million Dollars. This could not have come at a better time!
The Magna Carta was written in cursive script on a sheepskin parchment 810 years ago. It is a legal document that gave power from the King to a small group of Men. What the Magna Carta did was similar to the Greek direct democracy, by including people in political discussion, instead of the King alone.
The British Bill of Rights, signed in 1689, which is 336 years ago, was a sort of New Age version of the Magna Carta. For nowadays, the new age of the Magna Carta would be the Declaration of Independence. The British Bill of Rights basically gave everyone a fair trial and banned cruel and unnecessary punishment.
All of these political texts – the Magna Carta, the British Bill of Rights, the American Declaration of Independence, and all other that I have not mentioned – have slowly but surely lead up to what we have today; having “freedom,” a fair trial, and due process. Whether you like the current President of the United States or not, he continues to challenge these monumental, historic and foundational concepts.
Next week we will study the 1st Amendment and Abraham Lincoln’s Habeas Corpus Suspension Act. Harvard University’s discovery of an original copy of the Magna Carta is a wild coincidence as we are studying all this!!
I should mention that the essays are entirely my son’s concepts and phrasing, but together we edit them. As his scribe, I raise questions of grammar, word choice and structure; using the Socratic method, I challenge him but he decides as he dictates. We use library books as primary sources to frame the concepts, which he rephrases into his own words. If he does not know the word “plagiarism” he most certainly knows to avoid the practice.
As the school year draws to its close, we are preparing for a debate – 6th grade version – on the essential nature of government. Plato, the Athenian philosopher, argued that democracy is not viable, and the ideal form of government is a “benevolent dictator” more politely referred to as the Philosopher King. This is an argument for absolute strength in the Executive branch. In the current American moment, the occupant of that office is reviled by some as a dictator, and praised by no one as benevolent. My son shall argue in the affirmative that the strong leader must not only be unchecked and absolute in his control, but guided by good will, even compassion.
My son’s cousin, a Professor of Law, shall present the challenging argument, that “We the people” is a most radical proposition, but ultimately, an essential truth. We shall leave to him to define precisely how the many can actively support the one well being of the state. He shall argue that habeas corpus, which is due process, which is the rule of law, is the key to that functioning: the “Great Writ of Popular Sovereignty.”
My son clearly knew the answer to the true/false question, and summed the matter up well, saying, “Do you know how embarrassing it is when a 12-year old knows habeas corpus better than an adult?!! That is really embarrassing! It just makes Americans look really dumb!” He shall be fully prepared to debate what is good, what is benevolent, what is effective leadership for the state.
______________________________
Summer is upon us! Our warm weather starts are ready to go into the ground: tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, basil, and potatoes. Our cold weather starts do well and grow ever upright.







Redemption and Return
Posted: November 8, 2024 Filed under: Art & Healing, consciousness, What is an Art Farm | Tags: alpha males, books, divine feminine, greek-mythology, Homer, hypermasculinity, Iliad, mythology, Plato, the Republic, thucydides, trojan-war 1 CommentRecently, at the Friends School of Portland, I watched a performance of the Iliad that was remarkable; horrid and harrowing, vast and engaging, a testimony to the power of theatre.
The Fig Tree Committee, a group of Quakers from Portland, Oregon presents “An Iliad” to correctional facilities and the communities that surround them. Over 3,500 people, most of whom were incarcerated, have seen the production. In the Quaker vernacular, their work is a “leading” as it “…knits together audiences on both sides of the prison walls by using one of the world’s oldest stories to examine the cycles of violence, trauma, displacement, and hope for healing that unite us all.” https://www.figtreecommittee.org/
The Iliad, central to Classical literature, stands at the apex of Epic Poetry. Homer, the bard, is said to have written the poem circa 800 BC, retelling stories from the late Bronze Age circa 1,000 BC. The story revolves around Paris, a Trojan Prince, who abducted Helen, the wife of Meneleus, the Greek King. Extraordinary was Helen’s beauty, her’s “the face that launched 1,000 ships.” The poet sagely never describes her face, leaving that to the reader’s imagination.
For 10 long years the Greeks battled the Trojans, always to a standstill, which test of endurance is indeed the stuff of legend. The story – hypermasculinity and the alpha males’ dominance – is remarkably relevant to the world today. The Access Hollywood tapes seem but a modern day retelling of Paris abducting Helen.
The Fig Tree’s production used metadrama to connect the classic to the contemporary through the epic catalog of the 1,000 ships. The bard made plain such breadth by listing the many young men killed, but from American, rather than Greek towns, including Evanston, Illinois where long ago I read the Iliad in the Greek. That catalog foreshadowed what was to come, and what is playing out in America today.
Building to the play’s climax, the bard recited a brutally long catalog of wars – Ancient Greece through Europe to modern day Middle East and Gaza – 3,000 years summarized that took us ever deeper into the maze, to face the Minotaur; not half man half beast, but rather the vain beastial side of Aristotle’s “political animal.”
The Peloponnesian War – Sparta versus Athens, 431-404 BC – centered on the issue that “might makes right.” Thucydides, the Greek Historian, in 410BC wrote, “… right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” “Might makes right” is the moral antithesis of the path to compassion.
Plato, the Athenian philosopher, wrote the Republic, 375 BC, arguing that democracy was unworkable, “Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy … cities will never have rest from their evils,—no, nor the human race, as I believe,—and then only will this our State have a possibility of life and behold the light of day.”
The polite phrase is “Philosopher King” but the literal translation is “Benevolent Dictator.” The authoritarian strongman does seem ascendant now. Many say Victor Orbán is a modern day exemplar of the Philosopher King but his is an illiberal democracy, rule by the minority not “we the people.” Might makes right remains the macho battle cry and let’s be honest: hypermasculine alpha males have run the table for more than 3,000 years.
To my mind, the deeper long-term trend is that the Divine Feminine is ascendant, while the alphas, like dinosaurs, will fight to the bottom to preserve their long enjoyed patriarchy. I speak of masculine traits, not gender, and write this not to condemn but with compassion to decry so many generations of boys raised to be men who fight more than forgive, for whom “making a killing in the market” is a red badge of courage. Radical, indeed, was the street preacher, 2000 years ago, who dared say, “the meek shall inherit the earth.”
At the end of the March from Selma, Martin Luther King stood on the steps of the Alabama State Capital, and said, “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it tends toward justice.” The Iliad tells the same story. This masterpiece of literature is ultimately a story of redemption, the release of anger and hubristic pride.
At the Iliad’s end, Achilles speaks to Priam, the last King of the Trojans, and releases to him the body of Hektor, his son, whom Achilles had slain in battle. Each having lost everything, Achilles – the greatest among the Greek heroes, which is to say the paragon of the alpha male – found within himself redemption and gave back to Priam the body of his son, to be buried, returned to his native soil.
If the greatest of Greek heroes could find forgiveness and compassion, then certainly, so too, can we the people.
Work is to be done.
Let us be about it.
Now.
_______________________________________________________
I quote here from the Richmond Lattimore translation, Prius supplicating Achilles, the response of Achilles, the anointing of Hektor’s body, and the slaying of the “gleaming sheep” for a shared meal of Thanksgiving:
“Achilleus like the gods, remember your father, one who
is of years like mine, and on the door-sill of sorrowful old age.
And they who dwell nearby encompass him and afflict him,
nor is there any to defend him against the wrath, the destruction.
Yet surely he, when he hears of you and that you are still living,
is gladdened within his heart and all his days he is hopeful
that he will see his beloved son come home from the Troad.
But for me, my destiny was evil. I have had the noblest
of sons in Troy, but I say not one of them is left to me. (24.486-94)
“So he spoke, and stirred in the other a passion of grieving
for his own father. He took the old man’s hand and pushed him
gently away, and the two remembered, as Priam sat huddled
at the feet of Achilleus and wept close for manslaughtering Hektor
and Achilleus wept now for his own father, now again
for Patroklos. The sound of their mourning moved in the house. Then
when great Achilleus had taken full satisfaction in sorrow
and the passion for it had gone from his mind and body, thereafter
he rose from his chair, and took the old man by the hand, and set him
on his feet again, in pity for the grey head and the grey beard,
and spoke to him and addressed him in winged words: ‘Ah, unlucky,
surely you have had much evil to endure in your spirit.
How could you dare to come alone to the ships of the Achaians
and before my eyes when I am one who have killed in such numbers
such brave sons of yours? The heart in you is iron. Come, then,
and sit down upon this chair, and you and I will even let
our sorrows lie still in the heart for all our grieving. There is not
any advantage to be won from grim lamentation. (24.507-24)
“Then when the serving-maids had washed the corpse and anointed it
with olive oil, they threw a fair great cloak and a tunic
about him, and Achilleus himself lifted him and laid him
on a litter, and his friends helped him lift it to the smooth-polished
mule wagon. He groaned then, and called by name on his beloved
companion: ‘Be not angry with me, Patroklos, if you discover,
though you be in the house of Hades, that I gave back great Hektor
to his loved father, for the ransom he gave me was not unworthy.
I will give you yourshare of the spoils, as much as is fitting.’
“So spoke great Achilleus and went back into the shelter
and sat down on the elaborate couch from which he had risen,
against the inward wall, and now spoke his word to Priam:
‘Your son is given back to you, aged sir, as you asked it.
He lies on a bier. When dawn shows you yourself shall see him
as you take him away. Now you and I must remember our supper. (24.587-602)
“So spoke fleet Achilleus and sprang to his feet and slaughtered
a gleaming sheep, and his friends skinned it and butchered it fairly,
and cut up the meat expertly into small pieces, and spitted them,
and roasted all carefully and took off the pieces.
Automedon took the bread and set it out on the table
in fair baskets, while Achilleus served the meats. And thereon
they put their hands to the good things that lay ready before them.
But when they had put aside their desire for eating and drinking,
Priam, son of Dardanos, gazed upon Achilleus, wondering
at his size and beauty, for he seemed like an outright vision
of gods. Achilleus in turn gazed on Dardanian Priam
and wondered, as he saw his brave looks and listened to him talking.
But when they had taken their fill of gazing one on the other,
first of the two to speak was the aged man, Priam the godlike:
‘Give me, beloved of Zeus, a place to sleep presently, so that
we may even go to bed and take the pleasure of sweet sleep.
For my eyes have not closed underneath my lids since that time
when my son lost his life beneath your hands, but always
I have been grieving and brooding over my numberless sorrows
and wallowed in the muck about my courtyard’s enclosure.
Now I have tasted food again and have let the gleaming
wine go down my throat. Before, I had tasted nothing.’
He spoke, and Achilleus ordered his serving-maids and companions
to make a bed in the porch’s shelter and to lay upon it
fine underbedding of purple, and spread blankets above it
and fleecy robes to be an over-all covering.” (24.620-646)

