Babel in Ur
Posted: May 29, 2026 Filed under: Child Centered Activities, consciousness, Money & Banking 1 CommentMy son comes of age at the dawn of the post literate age, when seven fictive persons with valuation exceeding $23 Trillion USD own artificial intelligence and employ robots at scale, developing plans to colonize Mars while enjoying unrestricted freedom of speech. These fictive persons’ capitalization exceeds the EU’s entire economic output, is roughly 123% of China’s nominal GDP and is greater than the market valuation of every other nation on planet earth, except for the United States.
To put into perspective this 21st century tech vanguard, my son and I looked back to the 27th century BCE. The Epic of Gilgamesh, carved in stone during the third dynasty of Ur, is one of the earliest stories in literature, the first epic poem. The story is cautionary; technology, literacy and centralization tend to consolidate power and over millennia, the more things change, they may, in fact, stay the same.
I will proclaim to the world the deeds of Gilgamesh. This was the man to whom all things were known; this was the king who knew the countries of the world. He was wise, he saw mysteries and knew secret things, he brought us a tale of the days before the flood. He went on a long journey, as weary, worn-out with labor, returning he rested, he engraved on a stone the whole story.
In Uruk he built walls, a great rampart, and the temple of blessed Eanna for the god of the firmament Anu, and for Ishtar the goddess of love. Look at it still today: the outer wall where the cornice runs, it shines with the brilliance of copper; and the inner wall, it has no equal. Touch the threshold, it is ancient. …Climb up the wall of Uruk; walk along it, I say; regard the foundation terrace and examine the masonry: is it not burnt brick and good? The seven sages laid the foundations.
Uruk was a city in Mesopotamia, the “cradle of civilization” between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. Agriculture and irrigation were introduced there, around 5000 BCE. The world’s first writing system – cuneiform – emerged by 3200 BCE and was used to record the Epic of Gilgamesh. The Sumerian Kingdom developed the state-of-the-art technology for “burnt brick” as building material.
Southern Mesopotamia (present day Iraq) lacked stone quarries or forests, but mud and clay were abundant, and when they learned to control high-temperature kiln firing, they created durable, water-resistant “burnt brick.” Secured with bitumen “tar” mortar, the bricks became waterproof allowing larger, taller, more complex structures to be built.
By 2100 BCE, in the neighboring city Ur, the oldest existing legal code, the Code of Ur-Nammu was developed, and the King began massive building campaigns. The stepped temple towers he built, known as Ziggurats, became monuments to his centralized power; “built by Ur-Nammu” stamped on every brick.
The temple and palace as centralized control, using one language – cuneiform, an intelligence not available to the common person – to manage ever expanding economic power, by means of an algorithmic governance with slave labor, bears relevance to the dilemma of my son’s generation: the Magnificent Seven fictive persons own and control AI using chips made of sand and silicon by robots at scale, their massive data centers our modern day Ziggurat.
The First Patriarch of the Hebrew people, Abraham, was born in Ur, and would have grown up in the shadow of the Great Ziggurat, pondering the King’s divine right and his shrine to the moon god Nanna: collective monumental religion. Called to a different path, Abraham wandered in the desert, seeking the divine in a covenant of personal conscience and individual responsibility: monotheism.
Centuries later, when Abraham’s story was written down, very likely during the Jewish exile in Babylon, the Hebrew scribes wrote the story like this:
1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech…. 3 And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter. 4 And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.
The story of the Tower of Babel was certainly inspired by the Ziggurats of the Sumerian Kings whose temples were a highly organized center of commerce and religion, a holy staircase built to invite the gods down, an act of supplication, as though upon “bended knee”. The Jewish scribes, however, saw it as an act of arrogant pride – hubris – humans empowered to climb up, as well as the dangers of empire and lock-step uniformity; “confounding their language” forced diversity.
5 And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded. 6 And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. 7 Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech. 8 So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
The power of empire or the sin of hubris? A God of judgement and wrath or one who gently “confounded their language”? Our homeschool assiduously avoids the either/or as we seek the both/and multi-dimensional reality. We reached out to our Soul Brother to inquire of the Buddhist perspective. His reply: Dogen Zenji’s Genjō-kōan.
Dogen Zenji was a Zen monk, poet, philosopher who introduced the practice of zazen – seated meditation – to Japan. As a young monk, he travelled to China to study Chan Buddhism, the paradox-heavy, oxymoronic strain that challenges the rational mind. “What is the sound of one hand clapping,” Chan’s classic aphorism, applies surprisingly well to our AI era.
Chan Buddhism teaches that reality is nothing more than direct physical experience, not a conceptual framework defined by words, letters, or logic; information is not realization. Information is a tool – like the hammer and nail in my carpenter’s tool belt – and the real person must command their tools. AI unchecked can become a barrier stopping us from experiencing the physical world. My son should learn to use AI, but more importantly, to see the limits both of AI and of words. “A finger pointing at the moon is not the moon itself,” says the koan, so my son will soon confront the paradox; I have no answers, only questions, which he must resolve from his own direct experience.
In the Tower of Babel story, the perfection and harmony of one language was a conceptual trap, an imperial uniformity; reality is neither single nor rigid as the autocrat desires but is the diverse, varied “ten thousand things.” Written as a story of divine punishment, people “scattered…upon the face of all the earth,” Chan sees the Tower of Babel’s fall as liberation from delusion, a return to the earth where life unfolds with the friction of physical experience. Shame has no place in reality.
The act of building a tower to reach heaven is the delusion of separation, heaven as a destination attained via material accumulation. About reality Dogen Zenji wrote: “When ancestors gave expression to it, they did not search for it as something outside.” The ego may be chagrined, but clay and slime, the material used to make the bricks, is reality itself and the path to realization is to be wholly present in this current moment. There is wisdom in quiet receptivity, allowing reality to meet you as it is, on its terms.
Emperors, tyrants and the wealthy build monuments to themselves – “built by Ur-Nammu” stamped on every brick – such is their delusion, but so too deluded are the people who aggrandize and support same. The ego desires a permanent unchanging self, separate from others, but Dogen taught the self is fundamentally empty and interconnected with everything else: “To study the Buddha Way is to study the self. To study the self is to forget the self.”
In the end, after the people had been scattered, the decaying monument of mud and slime would have fulfilled its unintended symbolism, showing the impermanence of human constructs. For Dogen Zenji, reality is never something finished but rather a continuous dynamic process, the entropy of physics, real persons becoming, not being, which is the magnificence of humanity, even in its varied confused uncertainty.
“Firewood becomes ash, and it does not become firewood again… life is a period of itself, and death is a period of itself,” the Dogen wrote. My son is the firewood, now. My role to fuel his fire, to kindle his flame, to teach him to go, forward bearing his light.
Wolf of Wall Street
Posted: May 22, 2026 Filed under: Child Centered Activities 1 CommentIn 1891, with his Mother’s blessings, a 14-year old boy ran away from home in Acton, Massachusetts. Needing help on the family farm, his father had withdrawn him from school, but the strong-headed boy refused and so, with $5 from his Mother, off to Boston he went to seek his future. He found work as a “board boy” posting stock quotes at a Paine Webber brokerage. Working six days per week, five trading hours per weekday and two hours on Saturday, he was paid $5 per week.
96 miles north, but a lifetime away, the workers in Maine’s paper and pulp mills toiled 10 to 12 hours per day, 6 days per week, amidst deafening noise, excessive heat with high-pressure steam, and exposure to toxic chemicals like chlorine and sulfur dioxide. The “machine men” were paid $18 per week, while the “rag women” earned between $4.80 to $6 per week.
In 1890, only 45% of American workers earned an income above poverty level. Children, as young as 4 or 5 years old, but often by age 7 worked eight to twelve hours per day, six days per week, to earn $1. The Maine Memory Network reports, “Two million school-age children each worked fifty to seventy hours a week. Some of the children’s parents could not take care of them, so they were put in a place where they were forced to work while being contained by barbed wires.” In 1900 1 out of every 5 children was employed, but to the Puritan mill and factory owners this was a social good, even a favor, providing gainful employment.
Down in Boston, our “board boy” – quick with numbers and exceedingly clever – began frequenting the “bucket shops,” businesses that allowed bets on the rise and fall of stocks or commodities without actually purchasing the underlying contract; modern day prediction markets – Polymarket, Kalshi or Predictit – are high tech bucket shops.
In 1892 he made his first bet on five shares of the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad, returning a profit of $3.12, for a 62% return. By the age of 16 he quit his job and began trading full time, earning about $200 per week (the equivalent of $7,800 today). To repay his Mother’s gift that helped him run away, he returned home with $1,000; she disapproved of his gambling, to which he explained that he was, in fact, “speculating.” With his rare gift, he pioneered day trading.
By the age of 20 he had achieved a 1,000% return from his trading, and was banned from Boston. He moved to New York City, where he turned $10,000 into $50,000 in five days, and then, in 1901 at the age of 24, he went long the Northern Pacific Railway turning $10,000 into $500,000 (equivalent to $19.5 Million today). Such is the extraordinary power of trading the stock of fictive persons.
Back north in Maine, 1901, Hugh Chisholm’s International Paper Company controlled 60% of the American newsprint market, but espying an opportunity in the high-quality book and specialty papers, he established the Oxford Paper Company, its Rumford Mill producing both pulp and paper, about 44 tons of paper per day. Through International Paper, Chisholm controlled the paper trust, while through Oxford Paper he had the monopoly on producing all postal cards for the United States Post Office.
This is a story of “thought bearing animals,” real persons, using fictive persons – joint stock companies – to achieve dominance and power over their peers, the persons – men, women and children – who make things.
With each passing year, our “board boy” grew stronger, until he became known as the “Wolf of Wall Street.” 1906, still in his 20s, he went short the Union Pacific Railroad before the San Francisco earthquake; anticipating a decline, he sold the shares and when their value went down he made a quick $250,000 profit. During the Panic of 1907 he was short the entire market, making $1 Million in a single day.
The panic of 1907 caused a severe nationwide recession, surpassed only by the Great Depression. Bank runs caused widespread failures, jobs were cut and as credit dried up, industrial output dropped by 30%. J.P. Morgan personally stepped in to bail out the entire New York Stock Exchange and to persuade the “Wolf” to stop selling. The Wolf did, but then went long, buying back shares to earn $3 Million, on the rebound.
To the clever and cunning, the fictive person can be beneficent. Back north, in the river valleys of Maine, for real persons hardship only worsened. On Wall Street, the Wolf could earn $1 Million in a day, while in Maine’s paper mills, unskilled laborers earned $1.50, machine tenders $2.50 to $2.75, while Foremen earned up to $3.50 per day. With the market for paper weak, the warehouses full, International Paper Company and the Oxford Paper Company served notice that wages would be cut by 7.75%. But the cost of living had increased 11% in two years, and so the Paper Makers Union respectfully declined the Company’s offer. On 2 August 1908 the workers in Jay, Rumford, Livermore Falls and Orono went on strike.
The Union made two serious errors in judgment. The high inventory meant the corporations held the position of strength, so they shut down the mills entirely, laying off all the workers, including the Pulp & Sulphite Union members. The Paper Makers Union had acted alone, not including the Pulp & Sulphite Union in their decision. The corporate fictive person, using the strategy “divide and conquer,” easily argued they wanted to keep people working but had been forced to shut down. Things only got worse. International Paper rejected the Paper Makers Union demands and reopened the mills, the Pulp & Sulphite Union gladly returning to work, at a 5% wage reduction. International Paper advertised for strike breakers, who took those Union jobs. Capitalism does not work by majority rule, the real persons toiling in the paper mills lacked power; they were forced into a one-sided employment contract.
This discussion about fictive persons versus real persons rests upon a legal cornerstone laid down almost 90 years earlier, neither in Maine nor Massachusetts, but in neighboring New Hampshire. Trustees of Dartmouth College v Woodward is the landmark United States Supreme Court decision, in 1819, that established corporate charters are contracts inviolate and sacrosanct, protected by the Contracts Clause, Article I, Section 10 of the United States’ Constitution.
The argument was over education, and the irony is that education emphatically is and has been of local control, per Amendment 10 of the Constitution. The state wanted to make the private college public, to benefit all of its citizens. The State Supreme Court agreed, ruling in favor of the public good. But on appeal, at the Federal level, private contracts trumped public education when the United States Supreme Court ruled 5-1 that the contract is unassailable, regardless of the public will. The Dartmouth ruling became the bedrock of American free enterprise, protecting and empowering the growth of private corporations.
The fault line in that bedrock, however, is the myth that real persons are entirely rational actors. That fault line emerged in 1776, not in the “City of Brotherly Love,” but in London, England where Adam Smith published The Wealth of Nations, the foundational text of classical economics. Smith argued that “natural liberty” (free enterprise) was more effective and efficient than heavily regulated trade. His famous quote is, “”It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.”
That idea eventually grew to embrace Homo Economicus (Economic Man) which defined real persons as perfectly rational, narrowly selfish agents driven entirely to maximize utility and personal gain; markets are efficient because they are wholly rational. To his credit, Adam Smith cautioned that free enterprise, if unchecked, would lead to collusion and monopolies, “a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.” In the river valleys of Maine, the fictive person Homo Economicus arguably did conspire against the better interests of the public, being the real persons.
The Wolf of Wall Street was wise to that myth. Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds is a history of financial mania and non-rational herd behavior, a seminal book published in 1841 that directly contradicts the cherished myth of Homo Economicus. The Wolf studied that book closely, feverishly, which in part is why he went short the market – making fortunes – both in 1907 and at the Great Crash of 1929.
Here at our homeschool academy, the working definition puts a premium on the multidimensional, rather than the mono-rational, person. We embrace emotional intelligence more than narrow productive output.
My son is the same age as was the Wolf when he ran away from his childhood home in Acton, Massachusetts. My son can tour the river valleys of western Maine and see first hand the cause and effect of inviolate contracts and rational self interest of fictive persons. My task is to broaden his understanding, to deepen his empathy, to prepare him for a world that seems increasingly out of balance, as if real persons matter only as mere workers to feed the industrial machine.
_________________________________
Red Bud covered with blossoms, Gaia shouts, “summer is near!”

To Have and to Hold
Posted: May 15, 2026 Filed under: Child Centered Activities, consciousness, Money & Banking | Tags: abraham-lincoln 2 CommentsOur pursuit of personhood continues. Plato’s plucked chicken and Aristotle’s “thought bearing animal” both centered on materiality, to which Aristotle added the rational mind. There should be no surprise with that, given materiality and the rational mind were absolutely central to Classical Greek civilization. The birthplace of philosophy and science, the “life of reason” was considered their highest calling. Their art and architecture, such as the Parthenon, the perfect embodiment of geometric harmony expressed in material form.
Our homeschool emphasizes not the mono-rational mind but instead the multi-dimensional self; a person is more than a mind in locomotion. The Greek definitions, foundational to western Civilization, seemed too narrow and so my son and I travelled to the other side of the globe, to Asia, to see what thoughts would emerge.
Pudgala is a Sanskrit term (पुद्गल) that can mean “physical matter” or “person.” At its root, pud means “combine” and gala means to “separate,” so the core understanding is that change is the constant, clusters of indivisible atoms forming and breaking apart, all of which create matter, the building block of life. The term originated in Sanskrit around the 5th century BCE.
In Greece at that time, Heraclitus, the pre-Socratic philosopher, understood the universe as the “unity of opposites” constantly in flux, always becoming, never being. His writings remain only in fragments, sayings like “everything flows” and “no man ever steps in the same river twice.”
Known as the “weeping philosopher,” Heraclitus was followed in the 4th century BCE by Democritus, known as the “Laughing Scholar.” He reasoned the universe was composed of atoms (indivisible units) and the void (empty space); atoms, the building blocks of matter, never break or perish, but combine and separate to form clusters, differing forms of matter, by moving through the void. The co-founder of Atomic Theory, Democritus described the essence of fusion and fission, which is the foundation of modern atomic physics.
So whether from the Greek or Sanskrit, physical matter is clearly one trait of a person. Aristotle added in “reason” while Asian philosophers went further. To the Jain Dharma path pudgala was the non-living physical matter that makes up our bodies, breath and the physical brain, ever changing, both supporting and restraining consciousness and the soul. Within Buddhism pudgala usually refers to a mere person as the suffering self – the burden bearer – experiencing birth, death and rebirth. The Shaiva tradition of Hinduism went further, with pudgala as the person, bound in material form, whose path was to overcome physical impurities in their return to universal consciousness, the “man seeking to know divinity [śivatva].”
Such was the “Great Conversation” between these schools of thought, with multiple varying meanings hotly debated, but which seems remarkably similar to the “body-mind-spirit” concept of holism, popular today. Our pursuit here is to define a person including the dynamic of constant change. Maslov’s hierarchy of needs comes to mind; physiological, safety, love and belongingness, esteem, and self-actualization are all parts of a whole person.
After much discussion, we settled on our definition of a person as “a thought bearing biped mammal with consciousness of purpose, meaning, intuition and connection.” We are, after all, in pursuit of the multi-dimensional self, and how that compares and contrasts with the “fictional person.”
At the most basic level, consider the body. Corpus verum (real body) struggles with mortality, while the corpus fictum can exist in perpetuity. Kongo Gumi, a Japanese construction company building Buddhist temples, was founded in 578 and is the world’s oldest continuously operating company. The Hudson’s Bay Company, founded in 1670, was the oldest surviving joint-stock company until it was forced into liquidation last year. The fictional person is a superb entity to amass power and wealth over the very long haul.
Civil society is necessary for the fictional person to function, which requires real persons for that task. Real persons can be remarkably clever, to a fault. Consider that artificial intelligence is owned by the fictional persons, who have a combined market capitalization surpassing $30 trillion United States Dollars. As fictional persons employ robots at scale, will freedom of speech and personhood be extended further? Mind-boggling how creative we the real people can be, for better or worse. Caveat emptor.
But about that physical body, the corpus verum, a noteworthy thing happened long ago in England. Charles II, the King, convinced of his Divine Right, was unaccountable to Parliament. He raised taxes arbitrarily by decree and desired to send prisoners to remote overseas jails, beyond legal recourse. He was a rake and libertine, and the reaction was swift and complete. The Habeas Corpus Act 1679 was approved by the Parliament of England, taking power away from the King replacing it with a legal process preventing unlawful, arbitrary imprisonment. Habeas in Latin means “you have” and when the King would hold any body in prison, that body, the person, was assured their day in court. This became a cornerstone of democratic rule of law.
Our homeschool operates on the “friends and family” plan, and so for socialization I recruit help from Uncles, Cousins, and friends. My son’s Cousin happens to be an expert in Habeas Corpus, having clerked on the 2nd and 9th United States Circuit Court of Appeals and published, in the Stanford Law Review, the following:
“American habeas corpus, long conventionally known as the Great Writ of Liberty, is more properly understood as the Great Writ of Popular Sovereignty—a tool for We the People to insist that when our agents in government exercise our delegated penal powers, they remain faithful to our sovereign will. Once we grasp this conceptual shift, the implications for the law of habeas are profound.”
A noble argument, and yet in the history of the United States, American Presidents have suspended that Writ four times – most notably the “Great Emancipator” during the Civil War – plus one attempt concerning detainees at Guantanamo Bay, and the current occupant desiring to do so to immigrants. Last year the Cousin joined us by teleconference to chat about the Great Writ and why the corpus fictum (the government) would suspend the rights of a corpus verum (the person). A transcript follows here (edited for clarity and brevity).
Cousin: The basic theory of US government is: “we the people are in charge.” Habeas is a way to enforce the principle of law. If an Executive (President, Governor, etc) locks someone up, then that person is entitled to go to court. But in war, you can’t follow an ordinary process. [Discussion of Abraham Lincoln suspending the Writ during the Civil War, holding 12,000 civilians without due process.]
My son: It seems good and bad. I can understand Abe’s thought process but you should have a fair trial.
Cousin: [a discussion of prerogative writs, court orders restraining government officials from exceeding their authority] …In summary, these are regulating the question of who has power. “Prerogative writs” concern the royal prerogative, the privilege or powers specific to the King. In the USA this is the sovereign people, as exercised by the agents of the people.
[There followed a long discussion of “writ” and its derivation. I used example of “to write” which my son understood. The question arose of the phrase “the great writ of popular sovereignty” concerning whether, per use of the definite article, habeas is the one or are there others?]
The Great Writ of Liberty is the traditional name. Habeas was a mechanism through which all other liberties could be protected. Habeas was the vehicle for asserting other rights we have. The jailer must be held to account. [Discussion turned to Stephen Miller’s proposal to suspend habeas corpus.]
My son: Because (1) he likes DJT he would say this, and (2) he wants it to be really simple, any immigrant gets picked up, and gets locked up.
Cousin: A logistical simplicity. Yes. But why would many people think this is a good idea?
My son: Probably just a similar thought, just get rid of them.
Cousin: There are 11 to 22 Million people here illegally. There is a political will to change that. But what is the argument on the other side?
My son: There are many immigrants, and some are illegal, but this is not like Abe Lincoln at the Civil War. Now it is not really necessary. Everyone should have a trial. If Stephen Miller was being deported he would want a trial. If Donald Trump was being deported he would want a trial.
Cousin: At a basic intuitive level, it feels the crisis facing our nation is not as critical as Civil War. Was Lincoln’s suspending good or bad? If suspended, it is really important to guard our liberties, but all lofty ideals matter nothing if the country ceases to exist. How do you weight that?
Milo: Suspending habeas corpus should be a last resort. I don’t know what problems – people’s free will – but on a large level, it would fill up the jails.
In closing, the Cousin brought up Aristotle’s concept of the good as it relates to government; the state exists not only for economic survival, but to cultivate virtue, promote justice and to provide a forum for citizens to engage in rational, virtuous political activity; the “thought bearing political animal” oriented to the virtuous, not only the capitalist, life.
In Jay, a Person
Posted: May 8, 2026 Filed under: Child Centered Activities, consciousness 1 Comment
Chapter 1 verse 1 of the Gospel of John states, “In the beginning was the word.”
1 U.S. Code § 1 begins “Words denoting number, gender, and so forth…”
Words, at the core of our homeschool curriculum, define the sacred and profane. As my son learns the sacred Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος so I study the profane.
1 U.S. Code § 1 continues “…the words “person” and “whoever” include corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals”. Corporate personhood is a fictional person, “corpus fictum” is the Latin term, and so, this being May, it becomes clear our year end project shall ask: ”What is a person?” and, “what are the rights and responsibilities, thereof ?”
We begin with a chicken plucked of all its feathers. In his dialogue “The Statesman,” Plato defined human beings – persons – as “featherless bipeds.” A clever definition, in response to which Diogenes the Cynic threw over the walls of Plato’s Academy a plucked chicken to emphasize the difference between abstract theory and practical reality. Duly noted, our homeschool needs to be practical.
Aristotle, more pragmatically, defined humans both as a “political animal” (ζῶον πολιτικόν) inclined to form societies and as the “thought bearer animal” (ζῶον λόγον ἔχον). Of note, the word λόγον is the same as John’s λόγος, a word fundamental and rich with multiple meanings. “Word” is the common definition, but also “reason,” “logic” or “principle;” λόγος represents a divine ordering intelligence, a structural coherence. The German philosopher Heidegger would later argue “rational” is far too narrow as the defining human trait; “having” speech, discourse, and the capacity to articulate the meaning of our world is our defining trait. In the beginning, indeed, is the word.
All of this talk about persons and words brought to mind the landmark case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) in which the Supreme Court granted to the fictional person unlimited freedom of speech. For better or worse unrestricted corporate spending is free speech, supporting or opposing political candidates; persons real and fictive do articulate the meaning of our world.
All of this was becoming too abstract, so I hopped into my truck and drove north to Jay, Maine to see first hand what happens when the fictional person and the political animal come into conflict. We all know the rights, but what are the responsibilities?
Jay is a town of 4,620 people nestled in the foothills of Western Maine, on the banks of the mighty Androscoggin River. 178 miles long, the river flows from Errol, New Hampshire down across western Maine to Merrymeeting Bay before it empties into the Gulf of Maine. The river drains 3,530 square miles as it drops an average eight feet per mile, making it a prime location for hydro-powered mills and factories. The history of the fictional person making paper by the toil of many “thought bearer animals” largely began in Jay, on that river.
Hugh Chisholm, a baron industrialist of Portland, Maine, made his first fortune selling picture postcards. A shrewd capitalist, he decided to vertically integrate and control pulp and paper making. He opened the Otis Falls Pulp Company in Jay in 1888. It was among the most modern facilities of its time and, by 1898, Chisholm had merged 20 paper and pulp mills to create the International Paper Company, controlling over 60% of the newsprint industry.
History is rich with irony, bitterly so for Jay. Chisholm formed his paper trust, just before the “Rough Rider” President began busting the trusts. International Paper survived, thrived, and expanded but when the B-movie actor, who had served eight terms as President of the Screen Actors Guild, a 45,000 member Union, became the union-busting USA President, then International Paper Company turned its sights on Jay and decided to bust Local 14.
In 1987 International Paper Company was thriving. For more than twenty years it had been a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Index, and its profits that year increased 33% while net sales rose 42% to $7.8 Billion. Despite near-record profitability, the company demanded concessions in the form of wage cuts and givebacks (increases previously won), high monthly payments for health insurance, an end to double-time pay on Sundays, and the elimination of all holidays (including Christmas). Jay Local 14 went on strike.
The fictional person locked out the living breathing persons. The fictional person is responsible legally to its shareholders while the living breathing persons who toil in the mill are but a fungible means to that end. For the living breathing person responsible to family, friends and community the day is long, those are ties that bind, many of those families having lived in Western Maine for generations. The people of Jay stood tall. Those “political animals” inclined to form societies became a beacon to the world.
Solidarity is a noun, meaning “unity that produces or is based on community of interests, objectives, and standards.” Since 1915, the word has been the anthem and rallying cry amongst union workers. August 1980, workers at the Lenin Shipyard in Gdansk, Poland used that noun in naming their Independent Self-Governing Trade Union “Solidarity.” That union’s membership peaked at 10 million and played a central role in the end of communist rule in Poland. 1987, in Jay, Maine, solidarity was key as the strikers, community and people from away all came together in support of real persons fighting the fictional person.
The United Paperworkers International Union local 14 organized a focused community-based pro-Labor campaign: 24/7 picketing plus food and clothing banks, letter writing and a media campaign to broadcast the news. Massive rallies were held, including a 10,000 person march, and caravans sent across New England – one demonstration at the Bank of Boston – and even to Alabama to build support. Presidential candidate Jesse Jackson, in October 1987, visited Jay and spoke to 3,500 people. Support was widespread. The Chinese Progressive Association Workers’ Center in Boston mailed checks weekly to Local 14 to stay the course. A young woman, age 28 who happened to be studying art in Maine, created a mural showing the solidarity.
In the end, International Paper broke Local 14. The strikers were permanently replaced. In 2006 the mill was sold. Like a bad neighbor, the fictional person moved on. Its waste remains.
The Androscoggin River is known as “Cancer Valley.” From Rumford downstream incidences of cancer and illness are high, well above average, both from the chemicals discharged into the river and the mountains trapping pollutants in the air. The Androscoggin was named in the 1970s as one of the most polluted rivers in America, so polluted that it would lose all of the oxygen in its waters. Edmund Muskie, who authored the Clean Water Act, grew up on the Androscoggin River, and that legislation made a difference. The river has significantly recovered, but toxic chemicals remain in the fish while untreated sewage overflows during heavy rains. The river is still the most polluted in Maine. No one drinks its water. Except for animals.
The fictional person has the right to move off shore to find cheaper labor, while living-breathing persons, with homes and families, remain settled in the river valley. We the people – or, our elected representatives – have granted to the fictional persons extensive rights, with minimal responsibilities, it would seem.
“The company has gone, but the union lives on” is the motto of Local 14. On International Workers Day, I drove north to attend a rededication ceremony for the Local 14 Strike Mural in Jay. Standing room only, the event was robust with speakers and memories, including the artist who painted the mural, 40-years ago. The Local 14 chorus sang and we all joined in. A toast of sparkling cider was made, a meal was served. Solidarity and civility were shared in Jay, on 1 May.
Words and relationships are central to our homeschool. “Person” and “solidarity” are words to be discussed, with the crux of the matter: ”What is a person?” and “What are the rights and responsibilities, thereof?” And so begins our end of year summative, which will include an art-making mural project. Mark-making is meaning making, and the difference between fictive and real is an essential truth.
The Page, part 1
Posted: April 10, 2026 Filed under: Child Centered Activities 2 CommentsIn the Tarot, a Page represents youth, curiosity, beginnings and messages. On the floor of the State of Maine Senate, Pages are curious youths, beginning their path, who carry messages among Senators while the legislature is in session. To some, this may indicate politics is an occult practice, but I suggest that archetypes are omnipresent. Let’s choose the encompassing inclusive rather than the narrow argumentative.
My daughter was an Honorary Page, recently, on the floor of the State of Maine Senate. At times boring, other times riveting, the Honorable Senators gave speeches extolling these or those constituents, but also argued over Digital Privacy laws, ICE and immigration, SNAP benefits and equal rights to food for all Mainers. The YMCA Chicago was honored. The YMCA was founded in Boston, so it was hard to understand why Chicago was celebrated, but the Senators’ praise was unceasing.
Anne Carney – Senator for our South Portland District – chose my daughter because of her academic performance. The dress code was “business casual” which my daughter nailed, in a style all her own. I wore not the Carhartts of my day labor, but “family of origin” clothes: dress slacks, collared shirt, belt and a blazer. But no tie.
8am we drove north. We made the obligatory stop at Starbucks, which speaks a foreign language: “Venti iced chai with brown sugar syrup and brown sugar cold foam” is lost on me, so I ordered black coffee. We arrived at the capital Rotunda by 9, went through security, then found the Senate chambers. The Senators entered more or less around 10:15am. The decorum was pure British, the gavel absurdly large, the session went for hours, until we left about 2pm to get pizza. All-in-all a grand day.
A painting of Abe Lincoln towers over the chambers, and quite a story lies behind that painting. In 1819, Maine was the northern district of Massachusetts and petitioned for statehood. But the slave states refused to allow a free state – one not allowing human enslavement – to enter the union. A deal was made.
Missouri would allow slavery. Not for plantations but as small-scale farming and “hiring out” day laborers to urban St. Louis. The enslaved labor grew hemp and tobacco along the fertile river counties of the mighty Mississippi, and worked as laborers, blacksmiths and domestic workers but were prohibited from marrying, learning to read or write, or testifying against white people. Missouri as a slave state counter balanced Maine, as a free state holding firm the 12-12 balance on the floor of the United States Senate.
Thomas Jefferson expressed deep alarm and described the Missouri question, “like a fire bell in the night, awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the knell of the Union. It is hushed indeed for the moment, but this is a reprieve only, not a final sentence.”
Heather Cox Richardson, a historian from Yarmouth, Maine writes, “Mainers were angry that their statehood had been tied to the demands of far distant slave owners, and that anger worked its way into the state’s popular culture. The opening of the Erie Canal in 1825 meant that Maine men, who grew up steeped in that anger, could spread west.”
West went the young men from Maine. Elijah P. Lovejoy, from Albion, moved to Alton, Illinois, to launch an abolitionist newspaper. A pro-slavery mob murdered him and threw his printing press into the Mississippi River. His younger brother, Owen moved west and was elected, in 1854, to the Illinois state legislature, then became friends with an up-and-coming lawyer from Kentucky, the rail-splitter, Abraham Lincoln.
Elihu Washburne, from Livermore, Maine went west to become a pivotal Illinois congressman, known as the “Indispensable Man” aiding Lincoln’s campaigns from 1854 until 1860. Elihu’s brother Cadawallader moved to Wisconsin, and served three terms in the United States House of Representatives, while the youngest brother – William Drew – moved to Minnesota and served eight years in the state legislature, six years in the United States House of Representatives, and six years in the Senate. Republicans all, the Washburns are the only family ever to send four sons to Congress, each representing a different state.
At the birth of the Republican Party, Maine men served on its front lines. Again, Heather Cox Richardson explains:
In 1859, Abraham Lincoln would articulate an ideology for the party, defining it as the party of ordinary Americans standing together against the oligarchs of slavery, and when he ran for president in 1860, he knew it was imperative that he get the momentum of Maine men on his side. In those days Maine voted for state and local offices in September, rather than November, so a party’s win in Maine could start a wave. “As Maine goes, so goes the nation,” the saying went.
So Lincoln turned for his vice president to Hannibal Hamlin, who represented Maine in the Senate (and whose father had built the house in which the Washburns grew up). Lincoln won 62% of the vote in Maine in 1860, taking all eight of the state’s electoral votes, and went on to win the election. When he arrived in Washington quietly in late February to take office the following March, Elihu Washburne was at the railroad station to greet him.
The Grand Old Party spoke for equality for all, while the Democrats argued for white supremacy and oligarchy. When Honest Abe was assassinated on 14 April, 1865, his Vice President, the Southern Democrat Andrew Johnson assumed command. He vetoed the Civil Rights Bill to ensure Americans Black, Irish, Mexican, Italian, Chinese and Indigenous all should face discriminatory state laws. Congress overrode his veto, but the words of Andrew Johnson ring true to some, still today:
- “It is upon the intelligent free white people of the country that all Governments should rest, and by them all Governments should be controlled.” (U.S. Senate speech on July 27, 1861)
- “I am for a white man’s government, and in favor of free white qualified voters controlling this country, without regard to negroes.” (speech on January 21, 1864)
- “The blacks of the South are … so utterly ignorant of public affairs that their voting can consist in nothing more than carrying a ballot to the place where they are directed to deposit it.” (Third Annual Message to Congress, December 3, 1867).
- “I wish to God every head of a family in the United States had one slave to take the drudgery and menial service off his family.”
The Democrats then, the Republicans now, more than 150 years later we battle still the either-or of race consciousness. Maine, where my children come of age, was forged and fought for on the ideal that all people are created equal. Such was the cornerstone of my Daughter’s day as a Page, when she walked onto the floor of the State of Maine Senate, where Abe Lincoln towers overhead.
In terms of the balance of power, there are 35 Democrats, 14 Republicans and 1 Independent Senators in the One Hundred and Thirty-Second Legislature. On our day, there was vigorous debate between corporate rights and civic responsibility over LD 1822 “An Act to Enact the Maine Online Data Privacy Act.” That shall be next week’s story.










Eugenius
Posted: March 27, 2026 Filed under: Art & Healing, Child Centered Activities 4 CommentsThe sine qua non of my childhood, Eugenius and I grew up together in the era when Steve McQueen was a motorcycle riding bad-boy grey-sweatshirt-wearing prisoner-of-war locked in the “Cooler” of a Nazi POW camp. The sweatshirt was plain grey, no logo; the 1960s an era long before branding became “merch.”
Waking at dawn, Eugenius and I would eat non-sugared cold cereal in 2% white milk, lace up our black Stride Rite sneakers, pull grey sweatshirts over our head, then dash off, running until well past dark, endlessly in the woods and along the creek of our childhood home. Our mates were the Aiston brothers – Chris and Kevin – who went barefoot, even in winter. The youngest of 10 children, plus more than 20 cats, Rudy the Rooster and his flock of hens, and a Great Dane named Mukhuba, a name of African origin which means “strength or resilience;” life at the Aistons was at the vanguard of the counter culture. Our home was centrist-conservative, but we were allowed to run free, so long as we were home for dinner, hands scrubbed and seated at the table at 6pm, sharp.
We were joined at the hip. Touched by the muse, he learned the piano, so I taught myself the drums. Eventually I went to Art School and drummed with a Ghanian Tribesman Master Drummer, then dropped out, so when our Father, two months later, dropped dead suddenly, at age 52, I moved north to Milwaukee to run with Eugenius again.
He was in college. Following the centrist-conservative path, he studied Business Administration – Marketing at Marquette University. Following his heart, he rode the bus across town to study jazz theory at the Milwaukee Conservatory of Music.
At Marquette, I audited a Philosophy of Aesthetics class, read James Joyce’s “Ulysses” with a Knight of Malta (from West Allis, WI), discussed theology with a radical Benedictine monk, who taught freedom, simplicity and the enjoyment of sensory creation, “Desire is not sin. Desire is love waiting to happen.”
Eugenius’ jazz teacher was a man named King, a pianist-educator-mentor regaled as “avuncular and oracular.” King, who co-founded the degree-granting jazz studies program at the Conservatory, was widely known as a child-prodigy who became a harmonic genius. He grew up in Southern Illinois, received a Masters in Music in Nashville, Tennessee, then, during Jim Crow, emerged from the tradition of Earl “Father” Hines, bridging early jazz with bebop. A traveling jazzman, by night the King would get the white WASPs dancing, then slept in his car; no room at the Inn, the era of “separate but equal.” As if.
Seated beside the 5 packs-per-day chain-smoking King, Eugenius drank of the mysteries of harmonic theory, how to build chords, the conceptualization of “common tones,” the Circle of Fifths: the inner workings of the Muse and her music. Mante Ellis, a jazz guitarist and cofounder of that jazz program, remembers the King this way:
[He] would teach you all about everything, why it works like that. He was a monster wasn’t he?… he’d pick like F# lydian or something and make a kid go, ok, “F#”, you know, and he’d go through it and when you’d stumble he’d laugh. And he’d go up to you, because he wanted everyone to know everything. But the line he kept coming back to was, “The human mind tolerates what gives it pleasure, and what gives it pleasure is what it can do without thinking.”
And when he taught, he taught thorough. It wasn’t just a scale, he taught you why the scale, and why each note in that scale became a part of a family and the whole world was harmonious. Each tone in every scale is harmonious with itself. That’s why, you know… I thought about that. You go back and little simple shit that he taught, if you know that, man, it’s easier at the top.
What is sound? Well, sounds are vibrations that are controlled. If he asked anything about it, he’d ask what does 440 mean? 440 vibrations per second. Anything that vibrates is going to produce that sound. And what he meant by harmonious, you got even numbers and uneven numbers of vibrations. The even numbers won’t conflict. Uneven numbers and even numbers (hits fists together). Common sense. So, you studied with him, man you learned everything. The overtone series and all of that shit. Aw, man, he taught me all of that shit.
Eugenius as pupil, the King’s parting advice was, “You need to go break your heart. Then you will return to what you love.” In Milwaukee, we were kids “chasing the voodoo down” but as life moves on, so did we.
After Milwaukee, I studied Classical Literatures and Languages, while Eugenius moved to Kansas, a traveling salesmen hawking medical supplies. He was accepted into the Kellogg School of Business, Northwestern University’s world-ranking MBA program, but on the seventh day, walked into the legendary Dean Donald P. Jacobs’ office and announced, “I am going to drop out.” “To do what?” “To study classical piano,” Eugenius replied. Caught off guard, the imperious Dean Jacobs said, “No one has ever told me that. I wish you well.”
Having dropped out, west went the young Eugenius, and I rode along, his small Honda pulling a U-Haul trailer. We crossed the Rocky Mountains, the New Mexico desert by night, our destination the mile-high desert plains of Prescott Valley, Arizona. He found a studio apartment, bought a Steinway B, then slept under it because there was no room for a bed. He followed his heart.
Eventually I too moved west, lived with him again but then moved to Hootenanny Holler, Arizona, on my vision quest to create a currency based upon people’s ability to communicate. That was 1993, when the internet was young, a wild future was nascent. Data fuels the internet, and peoples’ communicating drives the data. What I saw was upwards of $300 Billion per year in profits, which if owned by the community, rather than capitalists, could become a vital force for the common good. I flew too close to the sun, crashed and burned. As the King had said, “You need to go break your heart. Then you will return to what you love.”
Decades have passed. I picked myself up, moved to Maine, worked as a carpenter and public art fabricator, but now homeschool my son at the “dawn of the post literate age.” I am increasingly convinced that rational self interest is self-limiting; that world culture is reaching a Copernican moment, when the mere rational needs to expand and embrace the intuitive, the heart, and its underlying motivations rather than the mind and its ego. So who better to call than Eugenius, to co-create a class “Math as Music: the Liminal Edge of the Rational and Intuitive.”
In the first class, Eugenius introduced the mechanics of the piano: 88 keys at 200 pounds of pressure per string, so >220 strings = 18 tons of stress, approximately 163.64 pounds of pressure per string. The lowest note, A0, needs a string 6’8” while the highest note, C8, is 1”; the physics of sound – discovered by Pythagorus, the Greek philosopher – states pitch is inversely proportional to a string’s length.
My son knows that when a vehicle passes, it emits a sound; not the engine noise, but the “whooshing” sound of displacement, an object moving through space. Pythagorus also knew that. So when Eugenius taught about harmonic overtones, the infinite sequence of harmonic pitches whose frequency is an integer multiple of any fundamental, originating tone, it was no stretch to talk about the “Music of the Spheres.”
Pythagorus intuited that the “whooshing” sound of celestial bodies – the sun, moon, and planets – produce a sound proportional to their motion, speed and size; Pythagorus saw perfect mathematical ratios creating a cosmic celestial harmony bathing the universe. Human life on Planet Earth seems chaotic, but the Music of the Spheres posits the cosmos is divinely ordered and harmonic.
It is only a hop, skip and jump from Pythagorus to Johannes Kepler’s Third Law of Planetary Motion, known as the “law of harmonies:” the square of a planet’s orbital period is directly proportional to the cube of the average distance from the Sun. Simply put, planets further from the sun take longer to orbit the sun. Kepler, strongly influenced by Pythagorus, was both a mathematician and a musical theorist, and his master work is known as Harmonice Mundi (The Harmony of the World).
So it this math or is it music? Is it jazz, or classical? Is life both-and rather than either-or? To an engineer coincidence is not correlation, but to a jazz musician coincidence can be inspiration. We are chasing that voodoo down. “Math as Music” is a playful exploration of pattern recognition, which is fundamental to intelligence.
Eugenius put it this way, “Curiosity plus repetition creates discovery and awareness. And the LOVE of LIFE instills a wonder and awe to understand the whole jiggling universe of which we are a quantum particle.”
__________________________
late spring, buds begin to push up…


















Bowl of Ammonia
Posted: March 19, 2026 Filed under: Child Centered Activities 1 CommentHere at the Art Farm Homeschool Academy, I wear multiple hats, and some days require me to switch back and forth rapidly. On Wednesday, I worked as Headmaster, Serpent of Caesar, pest control carpenter, and then Science Assistant.
As the Serpent of Caesar, acting for and on behalf of a private school, I am knee deep in a lawsuit concerning its building with a leaking roof. Ongoing for more than a year, it has been an all consuming slog, even though mine is a part-time job.
Late in the game now, we are working on a settlement where the roofer will repair its work. Lawsuits are essentially about money – a battle to get the insurance companies to open their coffers – and so an in-kind repair, at no cost, is highly unusual. The attorney – whom I shall call Themis – has said in 40 years of construction litigation, she has never seen a defendant offer to repair its failure. That would seem generous, but the quid pro quo is that the roofer wants a release from all future claims concerning its work, and that legal document is no small task to wordsmith.
Themis and I have been working toward that, and on Wednesday, surprisingly, the roofer’s attorney agreed to our proposed language. What had progressed very slowly suddenly went live, and I needed the Board to approve or reject the Agreement.
Over morning coffee, while work emails sailed inbound, I had been organizing my son’s day. For language arts, his assignment was to read from “Letters to his Son by the Earl of Chesterfield on the Fine Art of becoming a MAN OF THE WORLD and a GENTLEMAN.” The letters, written from 1739 until 1771, by the Right Honorable Earl to his illegitimate son served as a guide to etiquette and insights about diplomacy, politics and “the pursuit of excellence.” The Earl’s son, born of a commoner, would never be fully accepted into aristocratic society, but the father was committed to his hope. The Magister assigned for my son Letter III that describes the virtues of learning Greek, rather than Latin.
Pray mind your Greek particularly; for to know Greek very well is to be really learned: there is no great credit in knowing Latin, for everybody knows it; and it is only a shame not to know it. Besides that, you will understand Latin a great deal the better for understanding Greek very well; a great number of Latin words, especially the technical words, being derived from the Greek.
So, while my Son read Lord Chesterfield, I worked on the legal settlement, until, at 10am, when my son and the Magister had their class on the Greek accent rules, I changed hats, became pest control carpenter and went outside to check on our house.
My daughter had heard something scratching up in the attic above her bedroom. A serious problem. The attic vent had come loose, which left a gaping hole into which some rodent had entered. My only choice was to haul out the ladder, set it upon the porch roof, climb up to see who was there, and put the vent back in place. But raccoons had lived in the porch ceiling last summer, and eaten through both the asphalt shingles as well as the boarding below. Climbing up a ladder set upon the roof was fraught with risk but that rodent needed to go and the vent needed to be put back.
The attic was empty, so I reattached the vent cover, but noticed a raccoon had taken up residence elsewhere. They had left the attic – which was good – but moved above the porch ceiling – not good. Our Pit Bull-Rottweiler rescue puppy was going ballistic at the sound of my climbing above, plus the smell of the Raccoon overhead.
Pit Bulls are descended from the Greek Molossian “dogs of war” while Rottweilers are from the drover dogs of the Roman legion, used to herd cattle to feed the elite soldiers as they crossed the Alps into Germany. Pit Bulls are ferociously loyal to their owner, so our puppy was literally climbing the walls to protect me.
Raccoons are awfully cute, but we do not want them living in our house. Eviction was needed. A friend, from Vermont, told me that ammonia poured into a bowl is the trick because the rodent will move to get away from that smell. So as our puppy howled running to and fro, I climbed up and poured one gallon of ammonia into a metal bowl set above the porch ceiling. The Raccoon huddled in the far corner, hiding. The ammonia worked. The porch is vacant again. Truth is stranger than fiction. I still need to close off the porch ceiling, but things have calmed down.
Having finished the eviction, I went inside to work more on the lawsuit plus to help with science, which included recrystallizing kosher salt from our Red Cabbage Ph experiment. In my son’s last class the Mother Tree had taught, “Ph is a measure of hydrogen in solution. Solvent + Solute = Solution. Something that is water soluble is hydrophilic. Something that is not water soluble is hydrophobic. For the Ph Solvent is the water and Solute is the stuff added to create the solution. Water is what communicates to life.” Let’s communicate to life!
My son poured the red cabbage solvent from the jar, which left the solute – the purple salt – at the bottom. He scraped that out, spread it upon a plate to dry, then used a mortar and pestle to break the hardened salt. Admiring his creation, he commented, “We took table salt which is a solid. Put it in a red cabbage liquid. Turned some amount into a liquid. Took it out and turned it back into a solid, by using gas, an evaporation, which is covering all three states of matter: liquid, solid and gas.” I could not, in my wildest dreams, conjure that sentence so I am learning that he is factually correct. The homeschooling goes surprisingly well lately.
It is a curious fact that I am able to do this because I have a part time job, and am not allowed – by law – to earn much income. Social Security functions by a little known algorithm >62 + <18 = 2.027x, where FRA is 67. I am older than 62 and my son is 13. Both he and I receive benefits, with a cap on my income until I reach full retirement age (FRA). If you exceed that cap, the clawback is draconian, which means, in a culture driven to maximize income at all costs, my path is different. Time is on my side, plus just enough income, and time, for parenting as for life, is worth more than its weight in gold.
Lord Chesterfield taught that time was the most precious asset, its “true value” was to “snatch, seize and enjoy every moment.” We are in agreement.
__________________________________
Spring has sprung! Happy first Friday! Carpe diem!!!
















Misery
Posted: February 27, 2026 Filed under: Child Centered Activities, Farming off the Farm, What is an Art Farm 1 CommentMisery loves company, which is why we did the tiling work as a team, laying 259 square feet of tiles on hands and knees. The work is finished now and indeed, “teamwork makes the dream work,” which saying the end result has proved.
To make a distraction from tiling, we played the “Greek Syllabification” game. In fact, this was a lesson in logical thinking and, even though the local schools were on February Break, our Art Farm Academy remained open for business.
My son’s Language Arts teacher, known as “The Magister,” created the game as, “…an excellent, brief object lesson in logical thinking…a fitting complement to his thinking about and then articulating how an English sentence can be composed one way or another to suit the purpose of the statement. …it’s time to slyly ratchet up his ability to think and express himself more critically–and at the same time build his pride and confidence, which the strangeness of the Greek can occasion.”
I dared not tell my son this was an assignment, but instead spoke of the “game,” with four basic rules:
- Every word is made up of syllables and consonants.
- Every syllable makes one sound.
- The sound of a syllable is made by a vowel, or by a consonant with a vowel.
- To syllabify means to divide a word into its syllables.
Seven letters are vowels in Greek: α, ε, η, ι, ο, ω, υ. The combinations of αι and οι make up one vowel, which combination is called a diphthong. A Greek word has as many syllables as it has vowels or diphthongs.
While the Professor and I worked on our hands and knees, my son set up a table and chair, and we began. The contrast in postures was as comical as playing the game was wildly impractical. But we pushed on enough to lay both the game’s ground rules as well as more tiles.
Another assignment during last week was to calculate the degrees of the triangle formed from our first day’s tiling work. My son knows that every triangle contains 180 degrees, and our day’s work was a right triangle, meaning a 90 degree angle at the base. Using a tape measure, we found the hypotenuse was 115″ but the sides were not equal – one was 71” while the other was 90” – and if not equal then the angles could not both be 45 degrees. We needed trigonometry, not geometry, to solve the ratio of the sides of a right-triangle to find a specific angle.
My daughter, who excels in high school, was amazed that we would tackle trigonometry but such was the task at hand. Conventional schooling regards trigonometry as a subject for Junior or Senior year of high school, but anyone in the trades learns that you use the tool when needed. My son has already studied ratios so this was a chance to apply that knowledge.
Our problem, it turns out, has been discussed as far back as the Babylonians and Egyptians; was refined by the Greek astronomers, but Aryabhata, an Indian mathematician, discovered the terms used today: sine and cosine.
The word “sine” is derived from the Latin “sinus” which means “fold in a garment,” but that was a mistranslation of the Sanskrit word “jya-ardha” which meant “half a bowstring;” the Sanskrit derived from Persian, which, in turn, came from the Greek “χορδή” which meant “a bow string made of gut.”
The Babylonian, Egyptian and Greek astronomers were trying to understand arcs in a circle, which is the shape of the cosmos. Trigonometry became their language to divide a circle in order to map the heavens, and thereby understand the movement of celestial bodies. Rich history lay behind the very tangible question of the triangle we laid on day one of our mudroom tiling.
“Sine” is simply the ratio between the right triangle’s hypotenuse and its opposite side; the 71″ Opposite divided by the 115″ Hypotenuse equals 0.617. Converting that ratio into an angle requires the inverse function known as the arcsin; given the known sides we want to know the angle they form, the space between. Because the math to calculate the arcsin is complex, we used a calculator, but the concept became clear: our tiling had angles of 90, 38, and 52 degrees (which add up to 180). Not surprisingly, the Greek letter theta θ is used to represent the unknown angle. The strangeness that Greek can occasion!
Our Art Farm, then, teaches a practical truth that life is about problem solving, not meeting the metrics of a school curriculum. And in the “there are no coincidences” department, the Goddess happened to read to us a passage written by Melody Beattie about solving problems:
When we spend more time reacting to a problem than we do solving it, we miss the point. We miss the lesson; we miss the gift. Problems are a part of life. So are solutions.
A problem doesn’t mean life is negative or horrible. Having a problem doesn’t mean a person is deficient. All people have problems.
Recovery does not mean immunity to or exemption from problems; recovery means learning to face and solve problems, knowing they will appear regularly. We can trust our ability to find solutions and know we’re not doing it alone. Having problems does not mean life is picking on us. Some problems are part of life; others are ours to solve, and we’ll grow in necessary ways in the process.
Face and solve today’s problems. Don’t worry needlessly about tomorrow’s. When they appear, we’ll have the resources necessary to solve them.
Indeed, our core curriculum increasingly is the very practical lesson of stepping up to life to solve problems. And about that game of Greek Syllabification? By Sunday my son had finished the task. Greek is the least of the lesson. The point is to play by the rules and gain confidence in approaching and working through the unknown. Some serious mental gymnastics ensued, as he worked this through, including pronouncing the words after breaking them into the syllables.
1) ανεω (silently) 3 syllables: α νε ω
2) ερος (love) 2 syllables: ε ρος
3) θεωρος (spectator) 3 syllables: θε ω ρος
4) παμφαινω (to shine) 3 syllables: παμ φαι νω
5) ανθρωπος (man) 3 syllables: αν θρω πος
6) λιλαιομαι (to desire) 4 syllables: λι λαι ο μαι
7) νομοθετης (lawgiver) 4 syllables: νο μο θε της
8) ανοικτιρμων (merciless) 4 syllables: αν οικ τιρ μων
9) συγκαθιστημι (to bring together) 5 syllables: συγ κα θισ τη μι
10) χρυσεοπηνητος (woven with gold) 6 syllables: χρυ σε ο πη νη τος
















Love Languages
Posted: February 20, 2026 Filed under: Art & Healing, Child Centered Activities, consciousness | Tags: mental health 1 CommentGreek has 8 distinct words for love. Sanskrit has 96. English, 1.
In South Portland Public Schools over 35 different languages are spoken, with the primary languages being Arabic, French, Kinyarwanda/Kirundi, Lingala, Portuguese, Somali, Spanish and English. Love here is most frequently spoken as Amour, حب, Urukundo, Bolingo, Amor, Jacayl, Amor and αγάπη. Adding in Sanskrit and Hindi we have प्रेम, प्यार, Mohabbat, and स्नेह. All saying the same, merely different vowels and consonants.
Valentines Day presented an opportunity to underscore the many languages of love through a “Postcards from the Heart” art-making experiential held at the South Portland Public Library. The curly haired Goddess with whom I live developed the idea with colleagues and then served as the leader for this life-affirming response to the masked jackals rampaging our communities locally and nationally. Love is an antidote to fear, or as the Governor of Illinois said this week, “love is the light that gets you through a long night.”
The small minded Christian Nationalists argue that English is the one and only “pure” language of these United States. But we “the tired, the poor, the huddled masses, yearning to breathe free” know the truth is far more varied, nuanced and beautifully complex. The Postcards quietly acknowledged this, and gave people a chance to express themselves in a non-violent and compassionate way.
When authoritarian anger rips our communities asunder, when protests rightfully organize, and food drives bring meals to those unable to go to work or school, art-making might seem a trivial pursuit, but its healing power is unquestioned and clinically proven. The process of non-verbal expression creates a safe space to explore feelings, especially for trauma survivors. The act of creation triggers the release of “feel good” chemical messengers – dopamine and serotonin – which are uplifting and promote resilience. Externalizing our emotions offers perspective and empowers the maker.
Open to the public, 27 people participated with ages ranging from elementary school age children to elderly. One group of 15 from a women’s shelter wanted to attend but that would have overwhelmed the space.
I participated in one 45-minute session, gluing images of the Moon cycle, cutouts from old picture books, and “love” from 10 different languages. 7 other women participated, one of whom was older and wore delightfully eccentric glasses, while the other 6 were young women from a “sober house.” Everyone was engaged, focused silently on their work. At the end we walked about looking at each others’ creations, all of which were as varied and diverse as the forms and expressions of love. There was a deep sense of connection in a non-verbal form.
A friend, who works with immigrant women, strongly wanted to invite those women but feared they would not want to risk coming out in public. The idea has been raised about creating art-making kits that can be delivered to homebound people so that they also might give voice to their love, in any language. A local group, Maine Needs, appears to be doing something along these lines.
The City of South Portland has a wellness program for its staff, and a librarian pondered whether art-therapy could be engaged for them. The idea is scalable and replicable, and the need for healing only grows in these times of Mammon and the cult of personality.









































