Wisdom Is…
Posted: July 11, 2025 Filed under: Chronicles of a First Time Parent, consciousness, What is an Art Farm | Tags: Axial Age, Diotima of Mantinea, Goddess of Heaven, Jeremiah 7:18, White Goddess 4 CommentsBy coincidence, I happened last Monday to go into our dark dingy basement and was struck by an amaryllis bulb in full bloom. The bulb has a long history: we gave it as a gift to a friend years ago, but when she moved to NOLA, she gave it back. It bloomed for us last autumn, then in December was put into storage where it was forgotten. With neither soil, nor water, nor light it pushed up again into its full gorgeous flower.
Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, “The invariable mark of wisdom is to see the miraculous in the common.” With the flowering amaryllis as a miraculous symbol, we now search for seven wise women, and shall begin with Wisdom, itself.
In the beginning is the question, “Whence, wherefore and whither Wisdom?” “Whence” is an archaic word meaning “from where” which leads us to the “Goddess of Heaven.” At the beginning of civilization, throughout the Fertile Crescent – the Near Middle East – the Goddess of Heaven embodied themes of love, war, fertility and motherhood. Circa 4,000 BCE she was “Inanna” to the Sumerians, “Ishtar” in Akkadian, Babylonian and Assyrian cultures, “Astarte/Ashtoreth” to the Canaanites, later she was “Hera/Juno” to the Greek and Romans, “Nut” to the Egyptians. A Babylonian cunieform circa 1850 BCE references Venus as the “bright Queen of Heaven.”
Robert Graves, in his oracular masterpiece, “The White Goddess” writes, “…the language of poetic myth anciently current in the Mediterranean and Northern Europe was a magical language bound up with popular religious ceremonies in honor of the Moon-goddess, or Muse, some of them dating from the Old Stone Age, and that this remains the language of true poetry – ‘true’ in the nostalgic modern sense of ’the unimprovable original, not a synthetic substitute.”
Taking the form of the Goddess of Heaven in the Near Middle East or the Moon Goddess in the Mediterranean and Northern Europe, Wisdom was a celestial woman, worshipped. But then Abraham appeared circa 2100 to 1900 BCE and brought transformational change, slowly over millennia.
Karen Armstrong, the scholar of comparative religion, calls this “the Great Transformation” so that by the 9th century BCE the religious and philosophical traditions of our present day were laid down: Confucianism and Daoism in China, Hinduism and Buddhism in India, monotheism in Israel, and philosophical rationalism in Greece.
Robert Graves had this to say, “The [poetic] language was tampered with in late Minoan times when invaders from Central Asia began to substitute patrilineal of matrilineal institutions and remodel or falsify the myths to justify the social changes. Then came the early Greek philosophers who were strongly opposed to magical poetry as threatening their new religion of logic, and under their influence a rational poetic language (now called Classical) was elaborated in honor of their patron Apollo….”
The Old Testament, Book of Jeremiah 7:18 condemns the Goddess of Heaven: “The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger” (KJV). Hellfire and brimstone has had it in for women since the beginning. Armstrong describes the epochal change as the Axial Age, when the monotheistic male deity arose and the Queen of Heaven and Moon Goddess recede.
Wisdom is not gender specific, so let us consider “wherefore” which means “an explanation.” What then is wisdom? Webster’s Dictionary, Second Edition, (c) 1947 provides this definition, n, 1. quality of being wise; ability to judge soundly and deal sagaciously with facts, esp. as they relate to life and conduct; knowledge, with the capacity to make due use of it; perception to the best ends and the best means; discernment and judgement; discretion, sagacity. 2. scientific or philosophical knowledge; erudition; learning; as, the wisdom of the Egyptians, 5. a person embodying wisdom; — used as a title of honor or respect. Archaic.
Wisdom is insight, not knowledge; understanding, not facts; nuanced, not either/or. Albert Einstein said, “Any fool can know. The point is to understand.” Bertrand Russell said “To conquer fear is the beginning of wisdom.” Socrates said, “Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom.”
Socrates, the paragon of Greek rational thought, was taught by a woman. Aspasia of Miletus taught him rhetoric and the art of dialectic, and her intellectual salons, frequented by Plato, Socrates and Pericles, are believed to have shaped his thinking. In Plato’s Symposium Socrates says that he was taught the “philosophy of love” by a woman.
Diotima of Mantinea taught that love drives the individual to seek beauty, first in beautiful bodies – earthly beauty – then as one grows in wisdom, to seek spiritual beauty. Diotima taught that the correct use of physical love is to direct one’s mind to the love of wisdom, which is philosophy.
The path to wisdom seems shaped by women. And so we come to “whither,” which is “to where” does the path of wisdom lead? Ralph Waldo Emerson said simply, “The purpose of life is not to be happy. It is to be useful, to be honorable, to be compassionate, to have it make some difference that you have lived and lived well.” Rumi was simpler still: “Yesterday I was clever, so I wanted to change the world. Today I am wise, so I am changing myself.”
In the coming weeks we will tell stories of wise women. An ambitious goal, a list of 7, but more likely 7 times 7, or even 77 wise women. They are more numerous than the stars in the sky. The queens of heaven, indeed.
____________________________________
At our Art Farm, the lavender, coneflower and echinacea exclaim, a celestial harmony our eyes behold.





1/2 = whole
Posted: July 4, 2025 Filed under: Chronicles of a First Time Parent, What is an Art Farm | Tags: law of attraction, portland cement, rumi, Zeno of Elea 1 CommentLast October I was in Solitary Confinement, working in our Farmhouse crawlspace to stabilize the floor system of the Ell; a grueling but necessary task. This week I encountered Zeno’s Paradox as I began work on the foundation wall. The floor having been stabilized, I will now remove the entire perimeter wall and then rebuild from the ground up, while working below the house. “Pick your poison” as the saying goes.
Zeno of Elea was a Greek philosopher and mathematician. He was a student of Parmenides who taught monism – essentially, that all life is one – and as such duality and plurality are illusions of the senses. Zeno, a thinker of profound proportion, created logical paradoxes to demonstrate the absurd consequences of common assumptions about motion, change and plurality. The paradoxes of motion, considered his strongest and most famous, were summarized by Aristotle as follows, “That which is in locomotion must arrive at the half-way stage before it arrives at the goal.”
Suppose a Greek peripatetic Philosopher wished to walk to the end of a path. Before he can get there, he must get halfway there. Before arriving halfway, he must get a quarter of the way. Before traveling a quarter, one-eighth; before one-eighth, one-sixteenth; and so on. Thus one must complete an infinite number of tasks, which Zeno maintains is an impossibility given that time is finite. I trust the reader will understand why beginning an Ell foundation rebuild seems like an infinite task.
In 1830 when our farmhouse was built, the carpenter/farmers foraged for materials. Using horse or oxen they would have gone out into the fields to pull boulders back to the job site. Heavy lifting, then a hole was dug (by hand) into which the rocks and boulders were stacked one on top of the other. Mortar and concrete were not used on the foundation, just “dry stack” of large stones in a hole. This is referred to as a “rubble foundation,” which Frank Lloyd Wright used extensively throughout his career.
On top of the rubble a course of bricks were laid, upon which the post and beam structure was built. Mortar in the 1830s was different from concrete today. In 1824 Joseph Aspdin, a British bricklayer, invented Portland Cement by heating clay and limestone at high temperatures to form a strong hydraulic cement. He named his discovery in honor of the stones of the Isle of Portland, in the English Channel, just off the County of Dorset. But South Portland, Maine was a long way from the Isle of Portland, and the makers of this home did not use Portland Cement on their bricks; the mortar they used has disintegrated over these 200 years. And so my challenge of tasks seems to expand, endlessly.
Two and a half millennia after Zeno of Elea posed his paradoxes, their essential truth still challenges the rational mind. It is noteworthy that they were resolved – dare I say – by Jalal al-Din Muhammad Rumi, the 13th century Persian poet and Sufi mystic, more commonly known as Rumi. Essentially he was a monist, seeing the interconnectedness of all beings and the unity of existence. He embraced humanity – all humanity – and believed empathy can foster harmony and inclusion.
He currently ranks among the highest selling poets in the USA, and is revered around the globe; in a time so divisive, this is noteworthy. Consider this poem:
When I run after what I think I want, my days are a furnace of distress and anxiety;
If I sit in my own place of patience, what I need flows to me, and without any pain.
From this I understand that what I want also wants me, is looking for me and attracting me.
There is a great secret in this for anyone who can grasp it.
More commonly this is described as “The Law of Attraction,” which states “the good you seek is seeking you; you only need go halfway.”
And so we can resolve Zeno’s paradox through the mystical insight of the poet, and my foundational task becomes easier. I have hired a journeyman philosopher/carpenter far wiser than I, and hope to hire a crew of workers far stronger than I, so that as a team we shall overcome.
It Came to Pass
Posted: June 20, 2025 Filed under: Art & Healing, Chronicles of a First Time Parent, consciousness | Tags: CG Jung, hanged man, Isaac Newton, Ryder-Waite, saint paul of the cross, tarot 1 CommentWe ended our homeschool science class with the study of tarot. Some may say this is heresy, that tarot is not science, but I defy that line of reasoning. Consider these facts:
- The word “science” is derived from the Latin word “scio” which means “to know” or “to understand.” My son shall be raised to have broad, not narrow, understanding.
- Sir Isaac Newton, the paragon of the rational scientific method, was a lifelong alchemist. The Renaissance alchemists pursued rigorous empirical observation and experimentation; the notion of “active principles” that repel and attract arguably contributed to the theory of universal gravitation.
- Carl Jung, founder of “analytical psychology,” developed the concept of the collective unconscious, which resonates clearly with the tarot’s imagery. At the C.G. Jung Institute, he supervised research on the importance of tarot.
Such then, when I asked my son to pull one card from the Ryder-Waite deck, the “Hanged Man” emerged. At the age of 12, my son pulled card 12 from the deck. Jung referred to this as a synchronicity; events that coincide in time and appear meaningfully related, yet lack a discoverable causal connection. “Causal” speaks to the rational mind, but we were plumbing the subconscious.
At the age of 12 my son comes of age, which is a physical bodily experience as well as a deeply emotional and psychological transformation. Card #12 deals with beliefs that are stored in the subconscious mind, what is handed down. The Hanged Man represents a breaking away from that tradition. As my son comes of age, he becomes his own man.
Carl Jung believed that the archetypes are deeply embedded in the human psyche, and have emerged in the form of religious narratives. Saint Peter, the “Rock” upon which the Catholic church has been built, reportedly was hung upside down, by the Roman Emperor Nero. The hanging took place near the “Circus of Nero” close to the present day Saint Peter’s Basilica. The Cross of Saint Peter, an inverted cross, remains a central image in the arms of the Holy See and the Vatican City.
Let us consider this symbol more deeply. In “Tarot” Paul Foster Case writes, reversal in Hanged Man is “a reversal of thought, a point-of-view which is just the opposite to the accepted by most persons. In this scientific age we know that everything is an expression of the working of the law of cause and effect. …Practical psychology shows the potency of ideas. It demonstrates conclusively the truth that thoughts are the seeds of speech and action, that interpretations are the patterns for experience, that what happens to us is what we have selected, whether the selection be conscious and intentional, or unconscious and unpremeditated.
“The central theme of the hanged man…is that every human personality is completely dependent upon the All, here symbolized by the tree. As soon as this truth is realized, the only logical and sensible course of conduct is a complete surrender. This surrender begins in the mind. It is the submission of the personal consciousness to the direction of the Universal Mind. That submission is foreshadowed even in the picture of the Magician, who derives all his power from above. Until we know that of ourselves we can do nothing, we shall never attain the adeptship. The greater the adept, the more complete his personal self-surrender.”
Saint Peter of the Cross, in founding the Church during the Roman Empire, most definitely followed “a reversal of thought, a point-of-view which is just the opposite to the accepted by most persons.” To pursue this further we drove to Western Maine, to sit with a Reiki Energy Master, a White Witch, and talk about the tarot. This Master, as a child, lived in Morocco, Athens and Cairo; living now in the Lakes Region she is not provincial but broad in her understanding.
She explained that tarot is the journey to wisdom. The journey begins at 0, when you know nothing, and then you go through life. The Fool is ready to jump off the cliff. #1 the Magician has tools to become grounded, spiritual. #2 the High Priestess has intuition. #12 the Hanged Man is saying “take your time, there is no rush.”
She spoke of card #13 Death. She asked my son what he thought of death and he paused, then replied, “I think death is not good, it is bad.” She explained that death can be seen as a change, that all things must pass and transform. In that sense death is not bad, it is just change; it can be hard, very hard, but it is part of life. “The old self of the Hanged Man is changing. This is the death of the old way. Your Dad’s belief system will die off and you will choose your own.” She spoke about spirituality. My son explained that he had no religious practice. She encouraged a nature based approach. As my son comes of age, he will make many choices, his own.
Many cards had been lain on the table. As we cleaned up, the last card picked up was #13 Death. Again, synchronous, the Master commented, “You are all going through a transition.”
And so our season of homeschooling has ended.
No Room at the Inn
Posted: June 13, 2025 Filed under: Chronicles of a First Time Parent, Farming off the Farm, What is an Art Farm | Tags: Epirus, Greco-Roman, molloxssian hounds, pitbulls 3 CommentsOur Art Farm resembles Noah’s Ark: two adults, two children, two rescue cats, and two rescue dogs all live here. Recently a Mother Raccoon moved into the ceiling above our porch, and with four kits, that became too much.
Her tenacity was remarkable. To gain access she gnawed through the fascia boards and the asphalt shingles. Last autumn I tried to discourage her by covering the access points with lead flashing, but she persisted and then chewed through the ceiling boards and more shingles. Neighbors stopped to tell me about our four-footed squatter. She would lean against the asphalt shingles, stare at my son through his bedroom window, like Mae West daring him to come and get her. I knew we had a problem but it rose to a climax when, at 3:30am last Thursday, our pitbull puppy needed to go out and, given the commotion above, refused to come back inside.
Our pitbull puppy is an animal of the most remarkable agility and athleticism. To see her on the prowl is to marvel at the animal kingdom. Pitbulls get a bad rap, but intensely loyal and loving to their owner, they are descended from the Mollossian hounds, the ancient dogs of war. The Greek kingdom of Epirus trained the hounds for war and herding. Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar,” Marc Anthony’s line, “Cry havoc, let slip the dogs of war” is historically accurate. In Greek mythology, the goddess Artemis gave to Procris a dog that never failed to catch its prey. In the predawn light our puppy exhibited her heritage, racing across our front porch and back yard in search of her prey.
Our puppy was rescued from the streets of Webster Parish in Louisiana, and is 60% Pitbull, 27% Rottweiler, and 13% “Supermutt.” The Rottweiler breed evolved when the German barbarians bred sheep dogs with the mastiff-type dogs used by the Roman army on its military campaign through ancient Europe in the 1st century AD. Our loyal puppy is of Greco-Roman descent, proud to protect us at all hours of the day and night.
By mid-morning I began to rip out the ceiling boards. They were in quite bad shape and needed either to be repainted or removed. In fact, we plan to remove the entire front porch – it is not original to the house – so my task was both a step in that direction as well as a means to encourage the raccoons to move out.
The job was messy. Our puppy stayed inside while I laid out a tarp to catch the debris and the paint chips, which most likely were lead paint. I wore a mask and detritus rained down upon me. Animals have been living in that space for many years. Decades ago, word must have gotten around the town. Pre-covid, House Sparrows made their home there. It was awful. There in the corner cowered a raccoon. I stayed clear, and continued removing other boards. I needed to open up the entire front section of the porch ceiling.
I reached out to an animal rescue service, and the news became bad. Raccoons carry several parasites, including roundworm. A cornered mother can be vicious. No one was available to come trap and remove them, so the plan was to let them make their exit on their own time. Eventually the kits scurried about on the beams overhead. While their Mother went off in search of a new home, our puppy could hear the kits crying on the porch and stirred up great havoc, inside our house. Our puppy’s true nature was on full display. She could not be let out into the yard.
Throughout the afternoon the Mother worked her magic, carrying the kits – no longer so small – one-at-a-time by the scruff of their necks down our lilac bushes. We do not know where she went. One kit remained, and wailed for mama, but eventually Mama returned and then quiet filled the air. Later that evening, I took our puppy on a leash out into the backyard. She sniffed the air, and looked all around, even overhead, but nothing was turned up.
Quiet has returned to our front porch. My 4:00 am outings are less agitated. The Mother and kits have moved on. We wish them well and meant no harm, but there simply was no room at our inn.













Concrete π
Posted: June 6, 2025 Filed under: Child Centered Activities, Chronicles of a First Time Parent, What is an Art Farm | Tags: archimedes, concrete, habeas corpus, pi 2 CommentsThis week’s homeschool question was “How many US Presidents have suspended Habeas Corpus?” The answer, of course, is 7:
- Andrew Jackson at the Battle of New Orleans, by his sole order declared martial law (he was the commanding General, not yet the 7th USA President)
- Abraham Lincoln, by Executive Order, to rein in the “Cooperheads” a/k/a the Peace Democrats
- Ulysses S Grant, by Congressional act, suspended in nine counties in South Carolina
- Theodore Roosevelt, 1902, by Congressional Act, suppressed civil unrest in the Philippines
- Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 1941, by means of the Hawaiian Organic Act authorized suspension of habeas following the attack on Pearl Harbor, but in 1942, by Executive Order allowed a military tribunal to try and convict eight German saboteurs
- Bill Clinton, following the Oklahoma City bombing, signed the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
- George W. Bush, in 2001, by the Presidential Military Order authorized enemy combatants to be held indefinitely at Guantanamo Bay. But in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) the U.S. Supreme Court re-confirmed the right of every American citizen to access habeas corpus even when declared to be an enemy combatant.
All of these were in times of a crisis, and several of them included martial law. Given the dense history, my son’s Cousin, the Professor, zoomed in for a chat. The Professor has been published in the Stanford Law Review, where he argued that habeas is “a tool for We the People to insist that when our agents in government exercise our delegated penal powers, they remain faithful to our sovereign will.”
He went on to explain, “Given widespread consensus that English history should and does drive American habeas jurisprudence, and that the sovereigntist account of that history should now be treated as authoritative, it is puzzling that American courts and scholars have continued to cling to libertarian frameworks. Meanwhile, American habeas law is in crisis, with an ideologically cross-cutting array of scholars and jurists criticizing it as intellectually incoherent, practically ineffectual, and extravagantly wasteful. Over the Supreme Court’s past three Terms, Justice Neil Gorsuch has led a charge to hollow out federal postconviction habeas almost entirely, arguing that habeas courts should ask only whether the sentencing court was one of general criminal jurisdiction—and not whether it violated federal constitutional law en route to entering the petitioner’s judgment of conviction.”
My son and the Professor discussed all of this, at length. They compared the crisis of the Civil War to the current immigration brouhaha. My son reasoned that Mr. S Miller, “wants it to be really simple, immigrants get picked up, and locked up.” The Professor concurred, describing a “logistical simplicity.” My son continued, “There are many immigrants, some are illegal, but it is not like Abe Lincoln at the Civil War, now [suspension of habeas] is not really necessary. Suspending habeas should be a last resort. I don’t know what problems – it is about people’s free will – but on a large level it would fill up the jails.” The Professor concluded by speaking of Aristotle’s concept of the good.
As a counterbalance to these abstractions, we poured concrete. The front entry of a friend’s home was demolished when his neighbor drove her car backwards, at a very high speed, into the front of his home. Remarkably, the driver avoided the house but smashed the stairs. Insurance paid little – no surprise there – so our marching orders are to be frugal. We are making it work, and my son is part of the crew. Child labor laws do not pertain in our homeschooling.
The new entry will have a platform about 4’ high, with four steps to it. This is applied geometry and we discussed the area of a rectangle [width x length], the area of a triangle [1/2(width x length)] and the volume of a column [V=π r2 * h]. We needed to calculate the volume to know how much concrete to buy. To place the footings, we located two points at right angles and parallel to the house. Pythagorus solved that question. We used the 3,4,5 triangle; given a2 + b2 = c2 then 9 + 16 = 25 marked the exact locations where we would dig.
Like construction, learning requires a solid foundation. We began at the bottom and dug holes. We discussed the history of “Pi”, and its application to our task. “Pi” is the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter. The Babylonians approximated Pi at 3. The Egyptians refined it to 3.1605, and then Archimedes of Syracuse hit the mark by using the Pythagorean Theorem. He drew a circle and two boxes; one box fit inside the circle and one circumscribed the exterior. He reasoned the area of the circle was between the area of the polygons and thus Pi would be between 3.1408 and 3.14285. The Chinese mathematician Zu Chongzhi took a different route, performing lengthy calculations with hundreds of square roots to calculate the ratio at 355/113, which is 3.14159292035. Centuries later, in 1706, the Englishman William Jones decided to name the ratio “π” which is the first letter of the Greek word “perimetros”, which means “circumference”.
Our project’s head carpenter is a journeyman Master Carpenter, who has built homes on the islands of Maine for decades. Building on an island requires the ultimate resourcefulness; everything used is carried by boat to the job site and so waste is minimal. A calm and wise teacher, he explained use of a sight level, how to square the platform, how to measure and cut stair risers. The platform he built is remarkably strong and the client is pleased. My son hopes to handle the landscaping that follows.
Driving to and from the job site, my son spoke of the satisfaction of helping people using practical problem solving. My son also commented that jobs based upon information pay higher than jobs in physical labor. I will not sugar coat that truth: the annual salary of an average Professor of Law is $173,000 while the most skilled carpenter earns around $80,000 per year. Such are the values of this society (although AI looms large). My son’s path is unknown and we expose him to the yin and the yang, the full range of ideas and labor, as he comes of age.
About that volume, my son correctly calculated that each column was 2.8 cubic feet, which required 480 pounds of concrete. A heavy load, I was thankful for a young assistant.















True or False ?
Posted: May 23, 2025 Filed under: Child Centered Activities, Chronicles of a First Time Parent, What is an Art Farm | Tags: history, Magna Carta, philosophy, Plato, Socrates 1 CommentThis week in homeschooling, a true/false question arose: Is habeas corpus “…a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country”? We have, by coincidence, been studying habeas corpus for the past seven weeks so this question did not come out of the blue. What has been wildly surprising is to see the topic so hotly discussed in the news.
Our humanities seminar has been titled “Habeas Corpus, Habeas Vox,” which I described in my blog dated 11 April. We began by considering those words. My son knows that a hearse carries a dead body, which is a “corpse,” so the Latin word corpus was readily understood. Habeas corpus, he knows, has something to do with a body, rather than a Presidential right.
But what to make of that Latin verb habeas? We approached that by studying the Ancient Greeks. The Spartans governed by a combination of diarchy (two kings ruled), oligarchy with limited democracy. The Athenians, however, invented direct democracy, not representative democracy like our modern form. From Athens we jumped to Medieval England to read about the Magna Carta. In his “end-of-week” essay on 2 May my son wrote:
This week in Humanities we studied the legacy of Greece. Greece is located on the Mediterranean Sea. In Classical Greece, Athens was a city state that created democracy, but only the men citizens could vote; slaves and women could not vote.
The Greeks were known for the arts, architecture and philosophy. In Athens there was a teacher named Socrates, known for teaching by the “Socratic Method” which was asking questions to engage his students. Socrates was put to death by the courts because they thought he was corrupting his students. One of his students was Plato, who wrote the Republic, which is his views of democracy.
Something else we studied was English history. I read about the Magna Carta, a document that gives liberties granted to the English people. The English Barons and Nobles argued and threatened a Civil War unless King John granted those rights. King John was very greedy and selfish. The Magna Carta was settled on June 15, 1215 when King John affixed his seal.
The Magna Carta gives guarantees for the people as a whole. The people could not be convicted of their crimes unless they were lawfully convicted. The Barons (Nobles) had the right to declare war upon the King. The Magna Carta is considered one of the basic documents of British law.
Next week we will do studying more on English history!
We next proceeded to study the English Bill of Rights, and then the USA Constitution. Last week, my son wrote:
This week, Harvard University discovered they had an original copy of the Magna Carta. There are seven original copies, and Harvard just happened to have one. In 2007 an original copy of the Magna Carta sold for $21.3 Million Dollars. This could not have come at a better time!
The Magna Carta was written in cursive script on a sheepskin parchment 810 years ago. It is a legal document that gave power from the King to a small group of Men. What the Magna Carta did was similar to the Greek direct democracy, by including people in political discussion, instead of the King alone.
The British Bill of Rights, signed in 1689, which is 336 years ago, was a sort of New Age version of the Magna Carta. For nowadays, the new age of the Magna Carta would be the Declaration of Independence. The British Bill of Rights basically gave everyone a fair trial and banned cruel and unnecessary punishment.
All of these political texts – the Magna Carta, the British Bill of Rights, the American Declaration of Independence, and all other that I have not mentioned – have slowly but surely lead up to what we have today; having “freedom,” a fair trial, and due process. Whether you like the current President of the United States or not, he continues to challenge these monumental, historic and foundational concepts.
Next week we will study the 1st Amendment and Abraham Lincoln’s Habeas Corpus Suspension Act. Harvard University’s discovery of an original copy of the Magna Carta is a wild coincidence as we are studying all this!!
I should mention that the essays are entirely my son’s concepts and phrasing, but together we edit them. As his scribe, I raise questions of grammar, word choice and structure; using the Socratic method, I challenge him but he decides as he dictates. We use library books as primary sources to frame the concepts, which he rephrases into his own words. If he does not know the word “plagiarism” he most certainly knows to avoid the practice.
As the school year draws to its close, we are preparing for a debate – 6th grade version – on the essential nature of government. Plato, the Athenian philosopher, argued that democracy is not viable, and the ideal form of government is a “benevolent dictator” more politely referred to as the Philosopher King. This is an argument for absolute strength in the Executive branch. In the current American moment, the occupant of that office is reviled by some as a dictator, and praised by no one as benevolent. My son shall argue in the affirmative that the strong leader must not only be unchecked and absolute in his control, but guided by good will, even compassion.
My son’s cousin, a Professor of Law, shall present the challenging argument, that “We the people” is a most radical proposition, but ultimately, an essential truth. We shall leave to him to define precisely how the many can actively support the one well being of the state. He shall argue that habeas corpus, which is due process, which is the rule of law, is the key to that functioning: the “Great Writ of Popular Sovereignty.”
My son clearly knew the answer to the true/false question, and summed the matter up well, saying, “Do you know how embarrassing it is when a 12-year old knows habeas corpus better than an adult?!! That is really embarrassing! It just makes Americans look really dumb!” He shall be fully prepared to debate what is good, what is benevolent, what is effective leadership for the state.
______________________________
Summer is upon us! Our warm weather starts are ready to go into the ground: tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, basil, and potatoes. Our cold weather starts do well and grow ever upright.







Forex Foray
Posted: May 9, 2025 Filed under: Chronicles of a First Time Parent, Money & Banking | Tags: economy, finance, history, money, politics Leave a comment
For your next dinner party, an interesting parlor game is to ask the question, “What is the strongest currency in the world?” The answer will stump many, and most likely, will surprise all.
My son and I talked about this recently. We were at our Credit Union and he asked about gold in their vaults – they have none – which lead to gold backing the United States Dollar (USD) – there is none.
I quoted the old joke, “There is not enough gold in Fort Knox…” and explained the Nixon Shock, when on the hot summer night of 15 August 1971, Richard Nixon – by Executive Order – suspended the convertibility of US dollars into gold. With a stroke of his pen, Nixon unilaterally ended the post World War II Bretton Woods monetary system.
In Latin “fiat” means “let it be done,” an authoritative decree and in monetary terms the USD is a “fiat” currency; there is no underlying asset base because it is secured only by “the promise to pay.” In an era of rising national debt and hyper-partisan politics, that promise to pay can seem frightfully uncertain.
“Isn’t the USD the strongest currency” my son sagely asked? I explained that the USD is the world’s reserve currency, and so the strength of all currencies is in comparison to it. Some currencies are weaker (less value) while others are stronger.
As most people would, my son reasoned the strongest currency must be either in Europe or Asia, “Asia produces so much.” Economic output logically focuses on the “Group of 7” leading industrialized nations: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the USA. Our bias inherently is G7-centric.
We continued to talk, and he said, “No, it must be in the Middle East! They have so much oil.” He was onto something, and I told him, in fact, the Kuwaiti Dinar is the strongest currency in the world. The next three strongest currencies are also from the Middle East: Bahraini dinar, Omani rial and the Jordanian dinar. All are net exporters of oil, with a strong inflow of foreign currencies and stable governments.
A few years ago we drove north to Montreal, Canada. Before the trip my son and I went to a currency exchange to buy Canadian Dollars. He paid $1.00 USD to purchase about $1.25 Canadian Dollars. In other words, when he bought a Lego set in Canada it cost less than it would back at home; his money went further. A valuable lesson, and we had many fine meals on the cheap.
The lesson here is that the value of money is relative, not fixed. Long ago money was backed by gold, now it is fiat, while oil is becoming a dominant base of value. All oil sales are settled in United States Dollars – known as “petrodollars” – but China and Saudi Arabia have begun to settle in Chinese Yuan. The USD now is declining. The global movement seems away from fiat to asset-backed currencies. The omnipotence of oil backed currency would seem to make the transition to clean energy more difficult by an order of magnitude.
In the age when gold was the standard, there were arguments for both Gold and Silver to serve as the underlying basis. William Jennings Bryan’s historic speech advocating bimetallism, delivered in 1896 in Chicago, ranks among the finest examples of oratory in world history.
The gold proponents were the monied class on the East Coast. The silver constituency were the workers, the masses, the common man. Bryan reasoned:
“The man who is employed for wages is as much a business man as his employer; the attorney in a country town…the merchant at the cross-roads store…the farmer who goes forth in the morning and toils all day,.. the miners who go down a thousand feet into the earth…are as much business men as the few financial magnates who, in a back room, corner the money of the world. We come to speak of this broader class of business men.”
He then addressed the gold proponents, and argued against supply-side economics:
“There are two ideas of government. There are those who believe that, if you will only legislate to make the well-to-do prosperous, their prosperity will leak through on those below. The Democratic idea, however, has been that if you legislate to make the masses prosperous, their prosperity will find its way up through every class which rests upon them.”
He rhetorically cut down the gold position, advocating the bimetal monetary basis to support the common man, and then in crescendo, rose to his time-honored conclusion:
“Having behind us the producing masses of this nation and the world, supported by the commercial interests, the laboring interests, and the toilers everywhere, we will answer their demand for a gold standard by saying to them: “You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns; you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.”
Dead silence filled the Chicago Coliseum. Bryan feared he had missed his mark, until pandemonium broke out and he was raised onto the shoulders of delegates. “Bedlam broke loose, delirium reigned supreme” the Washington Post reported.
Gold, silver, fiat, or oil…in a world of constant change, the lesson for my son is that integrity need be his bank account, his word his bond, character alone counts. By that true standard he will do well regardless of the rising or falling tides of money and banking.
__________________________
In our home school chemistry class, solid progress had been made, my son has made his mark.















































